The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: email@example.com (Bob Wilson)
Subject: Re: Thermal resistance--does this sound right?
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 03:06:46 -0000
Organization: Your Organization
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit)
References: <3D781177.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3D78ECA4.4FAAE397@SpamMeSenseless.us.ibm.com>
In article <3D78ECA4.4FAAE397@SpamMeSenseless.us.ibm.com>,
>Bob Wilson wrote:
>> Nearly ANYTHING will give you less than 1 degree per Watt, for the large
>> area you are referring to (assuming the heat is evenly distributed). Even
>> grease at all (just air) will do it. So if you want to get a value of
>> less than 1 degree/Watt, use anything you want; grease, sil-pads
>It's fortunate that this is so, because the simple calculations people
>use (based on 1-D thermal resistances) become seriously inaccurate at
>small thicknesses. There's a poorly understood "interfacial thermal
>resistance" that becomes dominant for thicknesses less than 10 microns
>or so--it can easily be 0.1 K*cm**2/W. It's sensitive to the history of
>the surfaces and to the exact makeup of the joint materials. This is
>very inconvenient sometimes--I ran into it trying to figure out why
>multistage Peltier coolers aren't better than they are.
>Thermal transfer materials suppliers also peddle a lot of snake oil.
Yeah, like SilPads are as good as a greased mica joint!
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup