The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Subject: Re: OT: Chiao's experiment
Organization: The Armory
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test69 (20 September 1998)
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Richard Steven Walz)
Date: 07 Sep 2002 22:44:31 GMT
In article ,
Dirk Bruere wrote:
>"Richard Steven Walz" wrote in message
>> In article ,
>> Dirk Bruere wrote:
>> >"Kevin Aylward" wrote in message
>> >> The Schroedingers cat dilemma, isn't. It was simple a misapplication of
>> >> QM when QM first came about. A *correct* interpretation of QM does not
>> >> require a cat two be in two states at once.
>> >There is *no* 'correct interpretation'.
>> >As for things being in multiple states at the same time, a quantum
>> >would not work if it were not possible.
>> >Things as large as buckyballs have been shown to exhibit interference
>> >Whether cats can, and for how long, remains an open question.
>> Rather, though, than even TRYING to place the cat in two different and
>> opposite states, we need recall that till the issue is resolved we're
>> simply not even sure if there *IS* a cat AT ALL! It is NOT a matter of
>> knowing something contrary, but NOT knowing AT ALL!
>MY THEORY! is that by firing a live cat between two narrow steel bars we can
>measure its coherence by how much of its guts overlap on impacting a slab of
>cast iron just behind the bars.
>However, EVEN I! must acknowledge that we may have to use many thousands of
>cats in order to check the statistics.
>I want my Nobel prize, and I will SUE sarfatti if he even pretends to claim
>he thought of it first!!!!
I wanna watch! I know, I'm sick.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup