From: Mike Poulton
Subject: Re: Tracker implant for children - Real or Fake?
Date: 8 Sep 2002 21:28:08 GMT
Organization: MTP Technologies
References: <email@example.com> <3D7AFA3D.D1C3B84A@earthlink.net>
On 08 Sep 2002, Ian Stirling said:
> Mike Poulton wrote:
>> On 08 Sep 2002, Robert Baer said:
>>> (1) Absolutely *no* battery needs to be included!
>>> energy can be directly derived from the fluids in the body.
>> That requires that at least one electrode dissociate and go
>> solution. That would put metal ions into the body in high
> It wouldn't require that.
> If, for example, you could make a fuel cell that burnt glucose, and
> O2 extracted from the blood stream, and dumped the CO2 and water back,
> then you'd have an almost ideal power source.
> However, at the moment this is not practical.
> This could be rather handy, for everything from artificial hearts, to
> everything else.
> Imagine having to never worry about battery life again, just eat more
> burgers :)
I was considering only technology presently available. Barring major
technological developments, I don't think it can be done. Keep in mind
that you couldn't just use a "normal" glucose-oxygen fuel cell. It has
to be implantable, so all the materials must be insoluble, hypo-
allergenic, and not cause any local tissue inflammation or damage. It
would somehow have to interface with blood vessels for "fuel", which
would require a material which doesn't cause clotting -- very difficult.
Not only do I speak for my company, I AM my company!
Live free or die!