The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Dan Clingman
Subject: Re: non-contact temperature measurement
Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org (Boeing NNTP News Access)
Organization: The Boeing Company
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 00:48:39 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en]C-CCK-MCD Boeing Kit (Windows NT 5.0; U)
If you are after properties and not just performance with current
heating a better solution would be to use a water bath for cooling and
An other option is to build a thermal follower. That is construct a
device that monitors the heat flow from a section of wire then adjusts
the device's temprature to zero heat flow.
"Bill E. L." wrote:
> "Jonathan Kirwan" wrote in message
> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:37:52 -0700, "Bill E. L."
> > wrote:
> > >Appreciate any ideas/pointers.
> > Do you really want an optical solution?
> not sure really.
> the nitinol wire contacts 4% of it 'cold' length when heated. currently, we
> monitor force on and displacement of an airbearing stage in a spring-mass
> configuration. any contact (welding) to the nitinol would hider that
> contact-section's contraction as well as physically interfering with the
> free movement of the wire. I imagine non-contact would be teh way to go.
> >What kind of resolution and
> > accuracy?
> the temperature range should be 10 - 150 deg. Celsius (up to 600C if not too
> expensive) resolution & accuracy in the range of 0.5C is I think
> nitinol has a tendency to heat unevenly. it would be simply awesome to have
> a thermal image of the full length of the wire. but for now spot temperature
> is fine.
> > How much can you spend on the non-contact measurement
> > point?
> I have no idea how much these systems cost. but I think up to US$3000 might
> be ok with the PI. (I am a grad student at a university:)
> > What kind of deep IR have you tried? Sample rate? Have you
> > considered fluorescent methods?
> haven't tried any yet. all we measure now is force, current, voltage,
> displacement. the action happens over the period of one second. so a 1 kHz
> would be great (am I dreaming ?:)
> > Jon
> really appreciate it.. thanks
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup