The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Arny Krueger"
References: <email@example.com> <3Sjh9.firstname.lastname@example.org> <0Aqh9.381$HT1.email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Cancel speaker resistance?
Organization: www.pcavtech.com & www.pcabx.com
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:41:49 EDT
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:41:49 GMT
"John Woodgate" wrote in message
> I read in sci.electronics.design that Arny Krueger
> wrote (in <0Aqh9.381$HT1.firstname.lastname@example.org>) about
> speaker resistance?', on Mon, 16 Sep 2002:
> >Based on what I've learned about changes in harmonic content due
> >nonlinear distortion from
> >http://www.pcabx.com/technical/nonlinear/index.htm , it takes lots
> >nonlinearity to actually change sound quality.
> Depends what you mean by 'quality'. 1% of the wrong sort of
> can degrade some programme material to what many people would call
By modern standards 1% distortion is LOTS..
> > Nonlinear distortion
> >often increases with loudness, meaning that it is not as
> >at low levels.
> Look up 'crossover distortion'; much more evident at low levels.
I prefer to limit my discussion to forms of distortion that are
characteristic of fairly decent amplifiers made in the last 20 or so
> >In contrast, changes in frequency response are about the same at
> Since the human ear's response falls off rapidly at low frequencies
> low levels, uneven response at low frequencies is not easily
> low sound levels.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup