From: Philip Nasadowski
Subject: Re: Digital divide by ten, 1949 style
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:25:17 -0400
Organization: Biker/metalhead from hell!!!
References: <3D84D4B3.50B511EF@webaccess.net> <email@example.com> <3D893F55.1712189F@mfi.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Sep 2002 17:28:46 GMT
X-Harley: '99 FXDWG
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC)
In article ,
Jim Weir wrote:
> If you can get your hands on a Muntz TV or schematic thereof, you will see
> the damnest feats of engineering you can imagine.
Oh yes, Muntz's sets were known to be rather minimal. And not likely
great performers, either. His big contribution to the industry was
measuring the screen size diagnally, instead of the annoying square
inches or H X W others did. Supposedly, though Admiral used diagnal
inches early on, too.
> One section of one tube, with appropriate decoupling, can be used as an IF
> amplifier, audio preamp, and sound IF if you are very, very careful about
> linearity and such.
Hehehe. I'd love to see a Sam's of a Muntz.
> The same for other functions.
> As I recall, the whole set ran with just four or five plain old
> single or double-section tubes plus the CRT.
RCA in the 60's started getting really cheap with their designs. One
B&W TV I saw the schematic to had 2 IF stages, then a single tube for
the video out, another for sync, and then the vertical section was a
single tube. Their color sets had single tube vert sections, too.
Triode output amp too, IIRC.
My general rule of thumb is any TV without a power transformer was
likely a cheapo set, so don't expect much...
To email me, change 'usermale' to 'usermail'