Subject: Re: Fluke ScopeMeters?
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:04:48 +0100
Organization: Kijoma Solutions Ltd
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Sep 2002 10:09:36 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
whats toxic mould!
"Mike Poulton" wrote in message
> I am in a rather dubious position here. A few years ago, our house and
> everything in it was destroyed by toxic mold. Our insurance company won't
> pay, but we expect them to once the litigation is over -- the contract
> clearly covers such damage. That means I will get to replace all my old
> stuff with new stuff. That's good, except that I am presently without
> stuff! It took years to collect all that. I have started replacing it
> by bit, but I have held out on all the major test equipment. I had a
> Tektronics 20MHz dual trace analog scope, a 2MHz function generator,
> several small DMM's, and a great Fluke DMM (don't remember the model, but
> it was one of the best). Now I have two cheap DMM's from Radio Shack and
> handheld scope from Velleman.
> The question is this: Should I replace my scope and DMM's with a Fluke
> ScopeMeter? I can get a Fluke 199C ScopeMeter for about the cost of all
> previous test equipment. Most of my work is in audio and IF frequencies,
> and also way up in the UHF range (no scope for that!). I love the
> handheld scope, but it is nearly useless for anything serious. What have
> been people's impressions of the ScopeMeters? Are they good scopes, or
> have compromises been made to enable portability? Is the DMM function as
> good as other Fluke DMM's?
> Mike Poulton
> MTP Technologies
> Not only do I speak for my company, I AM my company!
> Live free or die!