The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (c3l)
Subject: Re: Digital design help needed.
Date: 24 Sep 2002 06:09:01 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Sep 2002 13:09:01 GMT
"George Gonzalez" wrote in message news:...
> > The problem I face is the noise generated by the Schmitt trigger. It
> > seems (from the oscilloscope) that when the schmitt triggers the data
> > acquisition board, the is a slight spike in the output of the S/H
> > amplifier.
> Anytime you have analog signals, they're going to be picking up
> digital switching noise.
> One approach is to slow down the digital transitions a bit,
> so there's less dv/dt current induced into the analog lines.
> A simple series R/C filter will slow down the transitions.
> Place it as close to the schmitt trigger as possible, and choose
> the R/C time constant to be 2 to 10 times the observed rise-fall times.
> Another approach might be to delay the trigger signal to the
> A/D board with a small delay line, so it doesnt start converting til after
> the spike.
There is a RC filter at the input of the Schmitt trigger. Basically I
use that RC filter to delay the Schmitt trigger to the A/D board. Its
the output of the Schmitt trigger that induces that noise spike.
Thanks for the tip! I'll give it a try and see what happens. It should
help but the whole point of my circuit to measure a specific point on
the pulse. The delay will introduce some uncertainty but if it works,
then at least the point on the pulse I'm measuring is more accurate.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup