Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <9Rhk9.1322$DY4.email@example.com> <3D91CA9B.E1640C20@saic.com>
Subject: Re: Overbroad Patent.
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust19.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1032965586 22292 22.214.171.124 (25 Sep 2002 14:53:06 GMT)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:53:00 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:53:07 BST
"RP Henry" wrote in message
> Kevin Aylward wrote:
> > "Don Pearce" wrote in message
> > news:firstname.lastname@example.org...
> > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:07:41 GMT, email@example.com (klmok) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Don't know about in the States, but such a patent holds no force
> > > in the UK. Prior art, trivial and obvious are all reasons to
> > > invalidate a patent here, no matter where it was framed.
> > So I take it that a device, which purports to effect a reduction of
> > charge flow on the presentation of an electromotive force, is out of
> > question.
> Field-effect transistor comes to mind. What did you intend?
The other response gave the game away. However, clever writing can get
this sort of thing in.
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.