From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Mike Harding)
Subject: Re: Any ideas on measuring radiation in the home ?
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:45:38 GMT
References: <%_wk9.52964$1C2.email@example.com> <3D9442F1.42F2FBAF@webaccess.net> <3D9467AC.9745AC66@webaccess.net> <8a%k9.56338$1C2.firstname.lastname@example.org>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:44:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:53:40 GMT, "News2020" wrote:
>< Thanks for the inputs so far and the circuit diagram, etc; I am trying to
>ignore the attacks and negativity.>
>I am not really 'worried' about this spark. The question was more general.
>There is potential for a LOT of 'mischief' in this area of expertise. And
>you will never have evidence to show. The damage will be imperceptible. Such
>as tones that match with brain frequencies and drive you nuts, reading
>brainwaves by thermal imaging, using imaging feedback to pump in controlling
>brainwaves, small cancers in blood vessels, muscles, skin, brain, blood
>cells, etc, a little burnt skin layers, some damage to the eyesight,
>cataracts over a long period, unnoticeable loss of hearing, clots under the
>skin that eventually get infected and turn into cancers, etc..., use of
>power lines and home sheet metal fixtures and appliances to inject 'really
>high-energy' microwaves, etc. And I am not talking product design issues
>such as the shoe measuring device or monitors that one poster has mentioned.
>I am talking deliberate, planned, secret people who could do such things. No
>one would know. No evidence unless you get the right measuring devices. The
>only question is, is it within the limits of the technology today. If the
>answer is yes, the devil is not very far. This kind of stuff has been around
>for quite some time. It is only a matter of further refinement and
>miniaturization and deployment, target/victim selection, etc.
Ah ha! You should come with me the next time I visit the aliens.
But I think we'll let them keep you.