The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Subject: Re: Lack of trolls, kooks etc. in SED --- Theories?
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Organization: The Armory
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test69 (20 September 1998)
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Richard Steven Walz)
Date: 28 Sep 2002 00:15:20 GMT
In article <email@example.com>,
Bill Sloman wrote:
>Jim Thompson wrote in message
>> |"Jim Thompson" wrote in message
>> |> Author R.S.W. and all its variations, and any mention of R.S.W. in a
>> |> Subject are auto-killed; so I'm never annoyed by him anymore.
>> |Your loss. He does *much* better abuse than Robert ever did (though Robert
>> |was improving).
>> |Bill Sloman
>> Nope, not my "loss". With 6 grandchildren, I find his
>> sex-with-children viewpoints just totally repulsive.
>> Of course I remain friendly and suggest that he visit Arizona and make
>> his case in a public forum... it'll be fun to count his bullet holes
>> in the next instant ;-)
>You have a strange idea of fun. R.S.W.'s childhood and adolescence
>seems to have been pretty strange, or at least unusual, but at least
>his interests and activities were confined to the god-given
>perforations in the human hide, and seem to have been basically
>Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Those who react that way I suspect of having been butt-fucked by their
older brother against their will till they can barely HEAR of sex as an
adult, and till they can barely manage to even BREED!
It seems to THOROUGHLY escape their ability to comprehend that kids, as
they imagine, could ever be interested in sex with older people, even
though the dirtiest little American secret is that most kids of immediately
pre-pubescent development do indeed fantasize about sex with people much
older than they are precisely when they first become sexually interested.
After all, they aren't going to be very interested in little kids with NO
secondary sex characteristics back along the path THEY just came, so they
are instead interested in people older than their own age and usually
quite a bit older!
I was one of those kids who wasn't abused out of admitting that I even
craved sexuality with older teens and adults when I was ages perhaps 8 to
formal puberty which for me was precocious at age 11.
Reactionary nit-wits like Jim seem to behave as if to pretend to us that
they never had a hard-on prior to adulthood. They assume that anyone who
wants kids to be able to consent to sex surely must be a pedophile, which
misses altogether the OTHER possibility, namely that such a person may have
been a kid who (gasp) WANTED to have sex with older teens and adults, as
every male in America whose nuts are bigger than peanuts COULD admit if he
wasn't frightened of being labeled a "perv" or a Dirty Old Man.
I want kids to have the right to consent for THEIR OWN sake, and NOT AT
ALL for those like me, as I *STILL* crave sex with older adults!!
I simply want the NEXT time I am born into a new incarnation as a human
being to be a lot less hopeless and miserable as a sexually aware child
than it was THIS time.
The funny thing is that *I* was undoubtedly abused MUCH less than bigots
like Thompson. AND it is precisely because I *WASN'T* abused that I have
the courage to TELL THE TRUTH about a child's REAL sexual desires which
WERE NEVER beaten down inside me, as so many of other people's seem to be.
It's always shamed beaten reactionary little bigots like Jim who simply
can't handle people even talking about sex, because they have had it all
beaten into a vile dark place inside of them.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup