From: "Michael A. Terrell"
Subject: Re: Any ideas on measuring radiation in the home ?
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:55:32 -0400
Organization: I'm trying!
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en]C-CCK-MCD (Win95; U)
References: <%_wk9.52964$1C2.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3D9442F1.42F2FBAF@webaccess.net> <3D9467AC.9745AC66@webaccess.net> <8a%k9.56338$1C2.email@example.com> <3D94D928.14D5D4C0@webaccess.net>
Chuck Simmons wrote:
> News2020 wrote:
> > I forgot to add: it can maim, paralyze or kill you too (stroke, seizure,
> > heart attack/arrhythmia) depending upon how much intrigue is involved. Even
> > in that case, there will be no proof or evidence readily available. If you
> > have worked with these things, and yet choose to belittle the hazards
> > involved in misuse, your judgement is in question, not mine. I was merely
> > indicating the possibility of danger (if misused) which is widely publicised
> > and well known.
> > A person who downplays the hazards or denies the hazards of mis-use of
> > equipment or gizmos is raising a serious question of honesty (or even
> > competence to be given responsibility), I think.
> OK, OK, who said there weren't any trolls here? Geeze!
> ... The times have been,
> That, when the brains were out,
> the man would die. ... Macbeth
> Chuck Simmons firstname.lastname@example.org
Yeah, but he is too small. You better throw him back. You know the
Michael A. Terrell