From: firstname.lastname@example.org (milne_v)
Subject: Re: Any ideas on measuring radiation in the home ?
Date: 30 Sep 2002 07:51:46 -0700
References: <%_wk9.52964$1C2.email@example.com> <3D9442F1.42F2FBAF@webaccess.net> <3D9467AC.9745AC66@webaccess.net> <8a%k9.56338$1C2.firstname.lastname@example.org>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Sep 2002 14:51:46 GMT
Check the homes wiring system for ground or plumbing currents making
sure that any inductive type appliances are not operating at the time.
The ground system should not show much signal using a scope. If there
are spiked transients on the grounding system while appliances are
shut off then you can assume that something is causing them which is
not associated with the normal operation of the homes electrical
system. Finding the source is another story. Should such transients
exist then they may also produce broadband AM radio interferance in
the vicinity. Make sure that items such as triac dimmer swithches etc
are also not operating. Ground currents and switching transients have
been suspected as a cause of problems in rural areas in the past,
there's no reason why they can't be a problem elsewhere. These types
problems are generally the responsibility of the hydro provider.
Getting them to inspect and correct may somewhat of a different
"News2020" wrote in message news:...
> I forgot to add: it can maim, paralyze or kill you too (stroke, seizure,
> heart attack/arrhythmia) depending upon how much intrigue is involved. Even
> in that case, there will be no proof or evidence readily available. If you
> have worked with these things, and yet choose to belittle the hazards
> involved in misuse, your judgement is in question, not mine. I was merely
> indicating the possibility of danger (if misused) which is widely publicised
> and well known.
> A person who downplays the hazards or denies the hazards of mis-use of
> equipment or gizmos is raising a serious question of honesty (or even
> competence to be given responsibility), I think.
> "News2020" wrote in message
> > < Thanks for the inputs so far and the circuit diagram, etc; I am trying
> > ignore the attacks and negativity.>
> > I am not really 'worried' about this spark. The question was more general.
> > There is potential for a LOT of 'mischief' in this area of expertise. And
> > you will never have evidence to show. The damage will be imperceptible.
> > as tones that match with brain frequencies and drive you nuts, reading
> > brainwaves by thermal imaging, using imaging feedback to pump in
> > brainwaves, small cancers in blood vessels, muscles, skin, brain, blood
> > cells, etc, a little burnt skin layers, some damage to the eyesight,
> > cataracts over a long period, unnoticeable loss of hearing, clots under
> > skin that eventually get infected and turn into cancers, etc..., use of
> > power lines and home sheet metal fixtures and appliances to inject 'really
> > high-energy' microwaves, etc. And I am not talking product design issues
> > such as the shoe measuring device or monitors that one poster has
> > I am talking deliberate, planned, secret people who could do such things.
> > one would know. No evidence unless you get the right measuring devices.
> > only question is, is it within the limits of the technology today. If the
> > answer is yes, the devil is not very far. This kind of stuff has been
> > for quite some time. It is only a matter of further refinement and
> > miniaturization and deployment, target/victim selection, etc.