From: "Peter Gottlieb"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <_F1l9.30$VI5.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3D9A879F.CF98EE43@citlink.net>
Subject: Re: (Avionics) How can this circuit produce an "inductive surge"?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 00:31:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 20:31:27 EDT
"Richard VanHouten" wrote in message
> > Why would you run a static inverter to make one frequency of AC then use
> > MG set to convert to another frequency? Seems like a real kludge to
> > not to mention, a very noisy setup.
> Well, if this is the product that my employer (then K/W Controls, Inc.,
> now Piller, Inc.) marketed, the static inverter was a standby unit, and
> the MG set ran off of mains except during a power failure. The 2 second
> ride-through of the MG set was plenty of time for the inverter to kick
> in, and your battery string would give you several minutes to shut down
> your computers, or let your diesel generator kick in if you had a
> premium setup.
> The frequency would drop a bit during the transfer, but IBM's spec said
> that was ok, as long as it stayed above (I think) 370 Hz.
Well, that makes some sense. But running a frequency converting MG set from
a UPS is not an optimal solution - why not just make the UPS run at the
target frequency? The magnetics at 400 Hz are much lighter and inexpensive
than those required for 60 Hz, and the higher frequency makes other designs
practical (eg, resonant).