The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Subject: Re: What is maximum current for LED?
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:41:29 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-193-19-60-62.vip.uk.com (220.127.116.11)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
"Steve Taylor" wrote in message
> Spehro Pefhany wrote:
> > The renowned John Woodgate wrote:
> >>Beyond 20 mA continuous you won't get significantly more light. But at
> >>50 % duty-cycle, you need to go to 40 mA to produce the same visible AND
> >>(more important) no excessive heating effect.
> > As the I^2R heating increases with the square of the current, and
> > brightness generally is (roughly) proportional to average current,
> > is most often a losing game.
> Apparent brightness to human vision is related to both the average and
> the peak brightness of the source ( Siemens LED app note.)
This is true, the eye remembers peak brightness too. By the way I don't
agree with Spehro here. Let's say you had a 5V source, 330R resistor and LED
at 1.8V forward voltage. So 3.2V across the resistor gives 9.6mA, power is
9.6e-3 * 3.2 = 31mW from resistor and 9.6e-3 * 1.8 = 17mW across LED. Now
double the current for 50% of the time. Power is now (19.2e-3 * 3.2)/2 =
31mW across resistor and (19.2e-3 * 1.8)/2 = 17mW across LED. I.e. the same.
However, the persistence of peak brightness means you can probably get the
same perceived brightness at lower current, hence less power.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup