The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Tarver Engineering"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: (Avionics) How can this circuit produce an "inductive surge"?
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:16:47 -0700
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
"Jim Pennino" wrote in message
> In rec.aviation.owning Tarver Engineering wrote:
> > "Jim Pennino" wrote in message
> > news:firstname.lastname@example.org...
> >> In rec.aviation.owning Tarver Engineering wrote:
> >> > You are way too clueless for this conversation, Jim.
> >> > John P. Tarver, MS/PE
> >> No response to the technical points; the only recourse left to you is
> >> name calling, John?
> > Your technical points are on the ground in flames Jim.
> If so, it should be easy for you to refute them on technical grounds with
> references instead of personal attacks.
I have qualified myself as a legal reference Jim.
If you have similar qualification, or written references, please feel free
to post them.
> > I recommend a look at the Blondel Transform for you, such that you might
> > gain some rudimentry understanding of balanced and unbalanced three
> > faults.
> And the theory of multi-phase AC distribution systems relates to the
> absurd statement that 400 HZ systems have smaller "rectifiers" in what
If you have a problem with the concept of reactive components and their
relationship to frequency, then I do not see why you are posting to a
> > Please don't make a further fool of yourself attempting to discuss
> > electricity in these newsgroups.
> Please respond to technical criticism with a technical response showing
> where the technical criticism is incorrect.
Did and done.
> I do apologize to the group for allowing myself to be suckered into your
> ad hominem responses to technical criticism.
You would do well to apologize for your incompetence in the subject at hand
Jim. You have no reason to be posting to this thread.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup