The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Colubris)
Subject: Re: Basic Stamp vs Pic processors
Date: 6 Oct 2002 07:06:16 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Oct 2002 14:06:16 GMT
I'm just starting out with the PIC processors myself. After looking
into Stamps (and deciding against them) - I'd definately go with
PicBASIC or PicBASICPro from MELabs. It's a BASIC compiler that is
(mostly) compatible with all the Stamp demo source code available all
over the 'net. It is very easy to use, well supported, and has a
terrific mailing list where all us beginners can learn from the pros
After you buy the compiler, you can purchase the "bare" PIC chips for
a few dollars - instead of shelling out $40+ for each Stamp.
There is a free demo "on-line" compiler for MELabs PicBasic -
something like www.compilespot.com
Only downside (for me) is no Floating Point, LOGx, or Exponent math
support. But Microchip has some FP code that can be adapted if needed
- and Tracy Allen has LOGx code written for the Stamp.
I've heard good things about BascomAVR too, if you choose to use those
BTW - with either PIC or Atmel chips - building your own programmer is
"Jim" wrote in message news:...
> Is there any relationship between what I can do (other than cost) between
> the Basic Stamp and any number of Pic's?
> What I mean is that I feel I need to come up to speed in hobby hardware
> design by using programmable chips. I don't presently own any Basic Stamps
> and haven't done any Pic programming, although I have used Pics in several
> projects....I've been able, so far, to get hold of the HEX code and have
> someone else load it into the chip.
> I do programming in Quickbasic, but no assembler, but I have investigated
> PicBasic in case I want to go that route. I REALLY don't want to learn a
> new language at my age for something that I will just be using
> I see on the web a good bit of BS2 code for the Basic Stamp for projects I
> am interested in. Is this code portable over to Pics in any way? I
> wouldn't mind investing in Stamp stuff to do some development and
> breadboarding, but wouldn't want to buy a Basic Stamp to go into every
> project I build.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup