From: Jim Thompson
Subject: Re: Problems with Electronics Workbench
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 00:19:17 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 20:19:17 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 01:11:38 +0100,
Paul Burridge ,
In Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design,
Entitled: "Re: Problems with Electronics Workbench",
Wrote the following:
|On 6 Oct 2002 16:12:31 -0700, email@example.com (Gary Lecomte)
|>I have the Professional Version of Electronic WorkBench 5 and I have
|>had nothing but problems with it. Even they couldn't get it to
|>properly solve a Relatively Simple Multiplier circuit so it would give
|>correct readings on the voltmeter. And I know the circuit works as I
|>built it! Besides that, there was no effort on there part to refund my
|>money or correct the problem.
|I wouldn't hesitate to sue them if I were you.
|But there again, I am quite letigious by nature.
I really don't know EWB, but I would bet it's based on Berkeley Spice.
Thus I would expect that simulation failure on a "known-good circuit"
is due to cockpit error.
For example, let me ask: Do you have a ground node... node 0 (zero)
Post your schematic on alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| Jim-T@analog_innovations.com Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
For proper E-mail replies SWAP "-" and "_"
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.