Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
Subject: Re: Problems with Electronics Workbench
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust19.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1033980984 23440 220.127.116.11 (7 Oct 2002 08:56:24 GMT)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:56:21 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 09:56:25 BST
"Roger Johansson" wrote in message
> "dob" wrote:
> >I consider that Electronic Workbench is an excellent program for
> >circuits - I use it with students and within about 1 hour, from
> >they can see what is happening with the currents going down through
> >resistors etc.
> >The circuit diagram capture is simple to use in EWB but does not
> >anything which could be considered as a professional circuit diagram.
> What is wrong with ewb circuit diagrams!?
> As far as I can see they use all the normal component symbols and
> connect them in a very easy to read way. Connections wire-to-wire are
> marked with big black dots, much easier to see than in other
> schematics capture programs.
Er....In SuperSpice you can set the connection dot size. A dot can be as
big as the entire schematic if you so wish.
> (I would prefer the international rectangle for resistors, but
> americans should feel right at home with the squiggly line resistors.)
In SuperSpice you can use squiggly line resistors or block resistors.
You can also use notation like 2k2 for 2.2k
> >The spice simulator is adaquate.
> I do not have competence enough to judge that, but I have heard that
> it is not considered the best or fastest spice simulator in the
> business, by far.
Most Spices out there all use the Spice3/Georgia Tech XSpice engine.
Some have done a few improvements. There is of course LTSpice, which is
a significantly faster and has much better convergence then moset
> The schematics capture in ewb is outstanding, the only easy to use
> chematic capture program there is.
This is of course, very, very debatable. I tried EWB before writing
SuperSpice, and it was evaluations like this that were partly the
motivation for SuperSpice. I personally, found EWB useless. I certainly
note that of all the spices, EWB seems to get quite a hammering in the
> The spice simulator might be of less than first class standard.
Which is not necessarily a problem.
> But you can use the schematic capture of ewb and export the netlist
> into a better spics simulator, with some consideration, because the
> netlist standard can be a bit different in different programs.
Can you read back in the output file?
> There is an ewb-to-eagle converter for creating pcb designs.
> In other schematics capture programs you might have to learn a new way
> of drag-n-dropping, while ewb follows the windows standard,
> leftclick-hold and drag to the new position, for example.
I agree, many Spices do not follow normal windows standards, e.g. In
some, you cannot even move components like you can the icons on the
windows desktop. Double-clicking should bring up dialogs etc.
As far as ease of use I would try adding new models in any product and
compare it with SuperSpice drag and drop:-)
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.