The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
Subject: Re: Problems with Electronics Workbench - timestep errors
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust19.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1033991231 23440 220.127.116.11 (7 Oct 2002 11:47:11 GMT)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:47:09 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:47:12 BST
"Gibbo" wrote in message
> Mike <> ????????? wrote:
> >I know nothing about spice and simulators, so I got EWB
> >because it looked like it was made someone like me, but if I enter
> >anything but the simplest circuits I get erros saying that the
> >timestep is too small. I've tweaked any simulation options that look
> >like they have anything to do with timestep, but can't get rid of the
> >errors. Any suggestions would really be appreciated.
> It's usually as simple as selecting a different component (in the
> schematic) as being the highlighted component. No idea why this
> but it does.
> The downside is that this usually just resuts in a different error.
> Eventually I worked out that sooner or later, by continually selecting
> different component, I could get EWB to simulate without an error
> It's then that one realises the results are garbage anyway. I think
> have it tell me it can't do it than pretend to do it and produce
> I made this same observation on this NG about 4 months ago and was
> flamed for it. Lots of people came forward to defend EWB. As far as
> concerend they haven't tried it. It is simply a piece of crap. It
> simulate anything reliably more complicated than a few resistors.
> I then downloaded LTSpice and Superspice. I've been very happy with
> them so I know it's not me that's at fault. They're not as easy or as
> to use as EWB but at least the results have some bearing on reality.
I have posted yet another update. Fixed more bugs and stepped into
LTSpice's territory. I have added a very generic, general Pulse Width
Modulator that can be used as a building block for SMPS, there is also
one example. Indeed, I'm thinking of making an entire library of Maxim
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup