The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Roger Johansson
Subject: Re: Problems with Electronics Workbench - timestep errors
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 19:39:56 +0200
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup2-7-58.home.se (184.108.40.206)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
firstname.lastname@example.org (Gibbo) wrote:
>Lots of people came forward to defend EWB. As far as I'm
>concerend they haven't tried it. It is simply a piece of crap. It can't
>simulate anything reliably more complicated than a few resistors.
I basically agree with that, but is has the best user interface, which
other programmers should take a look at to see how easy it could be to
use a spice simulator if the user interface is well designed.
>I then downloaded LTSpice and Superspice. I've been very happy with both of
>them so I know it's not me that's at fault.
>They're not as easy or as intuitive to use as EWB
I agree, and that is the only point I want to make here.
EWB *has* a very good user interface.
And these other programs could have been even better if they had
learned user interface strategy from ewb. A simple to use UI would be
no hinder for a technically much better program.
>but at least the results have some bearing on reality.
EWB often gives useful results at the amateur level, or seems to do
that, but I would never trust it in any situation where the results
are important in any way.
It is possible to export a netlist from ewb and use a real spice
simulator on the circuit if reality based results are needed.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup