Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with Electronics Workbench - timestep errors -
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:20:15 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 07:20:20 BST
wrote in message
> Just my thoughts as a newbie end user.
> After seeing, from the responces here, that EWB is basically a pile
> and should probably be marketed by Microsoft, I went to check out the
> Superspice demo to see if maybe it would do a better job for me. As I
> said earlier, I know nothing about simulators or spice. I saw this on
> the pricing/description page.
> "The Initial Install/Trial/Demo version has a top level save limit of
> around 30 spice netlist lines, and around 20 components in the next
> depth of the hierarchy, but has all features of all versions."
> "Huh?" I have no idea if those are severe limitations or not. I might
> be able to figure out if the prog is any good with only 20 components,
> if that's what it really means, but who knows what the other
> limitations are all about. I figured I've wasted enough time &
> bandwidth downloading demos that turned out to have so many
> limitations that I couldn't get a reasonable idea how the real prog
> would perfom, so I pretty much decided it probably wasn't worth the
> time and trouble. Then I saw this.
You can have 30 components on the top level. Those components dont have
to be simple models they can be blocks attached to lower level
schematics. These lower level schematics can each have 20 components.
This means that, in principle, you can have 30*20=600 components. No
other commercial demo of a simulator, to my knowledge allows such a
large number of components.
> "Licensee must request a new password file if the computer hardware
> is changed. However, new passwords will be provided free of charge.
> The licensee may have more then one concurrent password file, e.g.
> office, home and laptop password files. The software is licensed to
> the licensee, not the computer on which the software is running."
> Now ait a minute, let me make sure I got this right, it's licensed to
> me, and not the computer and I have beg for a new password if I change
> computers or finally get a computer for the bench. Ok, I'm confused.
> This is when I said naa, never mind. If it's going to be licensed to
> me, just give me the damn password for it and be done with it. I
> wonder what happens if the author decides he doesn't want to mess with
> it anymore, Or simplw doesn't respond to a request for a password
> file? Hmm, I don't need those headaches again! Sorry about ranting,
> but it's a pet peeve after getting burned once. I'll stick with
> SwitcherCad, it's not the easiest prog in the world to use, but it
> works well and you certainly can't beat the price. Btw, How do I add
> parts to SwitcherCad? Ahh, Just kidding.
You should have read *all* of the page. There are two main password
options. One is in the vain of Windows XP, i.e. it locks to hardware.
Many Cad packages do this.
The second option is to pay a little more, i.e. $300 verses $225 for the
gold versions, and get a password file that is usable on *any* computer,
but is licensed only for that individual.
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.