Subject: Re: Best way to power array of LEDs?
Summary: What do you think of these ping times eh?
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 03:03:10 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 23:03:10 EDT
On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 12:46:16 -0700, Lizard Blizzard
>> Only the required lamps. Accessory lighting, including additional
>> brake lamps only have to have certain color restrictions, and there is
>> a brightness MAXIMUM, but no minimum. As long as the vehicle retains
>> the required set of two rear brake lamps, the others are up to him.
>> Modern cars today have a requisite for the third brake lamp by the
>> DOT, but the roadways must be backward compliant, so older cars do not
>> require them. How can one regulate something that is not obligated to
>> be there by law.
>> Cars run around with purple and blue fluorescent lamps lit up all
>> over them... where have you been?
>> I liked the days when headlight brightness was more tightly
>> regulated... I know that.
>Not only do you make inconsiderate remarks about other posters, you're
>inconsiderate of the other readers. In case you're not aware of it,
>readers from other countries might think you're daft when you talk about
> regulations, because you didn't qualify them by stating where you're from.
Dumbshit. The previous poster mentioned the DOT. That IS US based,
dipshit. Get a clue.
Every bezel of every lamp on every car that is considered "road
worthy" in this country by the DOT has US DOT bezels over their lamps.
Better get yer story straight before you jump next time. Otherwise,
you'll expose your lameness even further.
I don't need to qualify a damned thing, you dumbass.
If a usenet reader is too stupid to know how to read posting headers
to find out where the post was made from, he is really too stupid to
be here, and should be taken out back, and shot full of "The Stuff".