From: "Bill Sloman"
Subject: Re: Cell phone emissions
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:19:44 +0200
Organization: Planet Internet
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Oct 2002 22:19:40 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
"News2020" wrote in message
> That just makes you a blind supporter of the selected group of 'experts'.
A supporter, but not necessarily blind - I wasn't posting anonymously, and I
do know a little about the issues involved.
> Therefore, your own independent opinion on the
> postings/writers/subject-matter do not carry any weight - no basis. Just
> voice among many.
I wasn't advancing my own opinion - just pointing out that if you want to
disagree with The Swedish Radiation Protection Authority and their chosen
pair of internationally well-known epidemiologists, Dr. John D. Boice, Jr.
and Dr. Joseph K. McLaughlin from the International Epidemiology Institute,
USA, you have to come up with something more persuasive than a vague feeling
of disquiet, which seemed to be the sum total of JohnS's arguement.
> < There is a lot of money involved in this area; therefore, I shall leave
> to others to figure out such questions...>
Accusing the named experts of having accepted bribes is libel, and could
prove expensive if they get irritated enough to extract your identity from
your service provider. If you had any evidence of corruption, you would have
a serious arguement. So produce it, or shut up. Your mealy-mouthed
formulation won't save your sorry arse, or your abusive log-in, if your
ostensibly anonymous accusation hits a nerve.
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen