Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
Subject: Re: Problems with Electronics Workbench - timestep errors
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust19.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1034277857 29857 18.104.22.168 (10 Oct 2002 19:24:17 GMT)
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:24:18 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:24:18 BST
"Gibbo" wrote in message
> "Kevin Aylward" email@example.com wrote:
> [large snip]
> >Look, I'm a guitarist, a bloody good guitarist. Been doing it for 30+
> >years. It drives me up the f'ing wall when I am using a midi
> >and it has a virtual front panel of a foot phaser pedal box. I don't
> >want to twiddle bloody knobs. I want to enter data directly. Knobs
> >compromise forced on by the mechanics of the real thing. Its daft to
> >force a poor interface into the software just because you are
> >to grow up and learn a better way of doing things.
> First let me say that I use superspice and find it to be brilliant (I
> even buy the unlimited version pretty soon) but I'd still like a scope
on it :)
Have a look at tonight's screen shot. The tabs on the file browser are
much better, you can now place circuit sections like current mirrors,
diffpair etc just as you would do a single component.
> My point here is that your above paragraph has just shown to me that
> purely a personal choice. I too am a guitarist, also a bloody good
one, and I
> prefer knobs and dials. Personal choice. Nothing more, nothing less.
I hope you realise that I meant I prefer data entry rather then knobs
and dials for *software*. Obviously, in hardware, in this sort of
application, I want to stomp a footswitch!
But note, I only like to have one volume knob. I like it to very simple.
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.