The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: email@example.com (john jardine)
Subject: Re: Cheap low frequency impedance bridge?
Date: 11 Oct 2002 07:25:27 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Oct 2002 14:25:27 GMT
"Bill Sloman" wrote in message news:...
> I've got a component at work that looks like a resistance in series with a
> capacitor, and I've got to monitor the capacitance fairly precisely to look
> for degradation in use - the device is set up so that the resistive
> impedance (which is what we are interested in) almost dominates the
> impedance at the measurement frequency, but the capacitance can get eroded
> in service, and we are going to have put numbers on this.
> The measurement frequency range is 2kHz to 200kHz, and we'll probably
> monitor down to rather lower frequencies if we can, to boost the reactive
> impedance to more or less match the resistive component.
> So I need an impedance bridge. I don't need - and couldn't pay for - an RF
> mpedance bridge going into the MHz range.
> The resistive impedance range runs from to 10R to 10k, but the region up to
> 100R is the most interesting. The capacitance runs from about 1uF to about
> 100uF, and the higher values are frequency dependent (just to make life
> interesting and to exclude LCR measuring gear that doesn't give you control
> over the excitation frequency).
> The excitation voltage should be about 5mV rms - we've used more (up to
> about 100mV) without seeing any gross problems, but more precise
> measurements may need the lower drive level.
> We've done some preliminary work on an HP 4192A bridge in a nearby
> university lab, at vast expense. The HP4192A was just what I wanted, but
> Agilent don't make it any more, and my boss couldn't afford to buy it if
> they did.
> Anybody know of anything cheap that offers frequencies up to 200kHz? I used
> a signal generator and an oscilloscope for the intial development, a couple
> of years ago, but for this work we really need something rather more
> Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
You've got a real stonker of a measuring problem here. I make the D
values ranging from '8'(2kHz-1u-10r) to '.000008'(200kHz-100u-10k) and
consequent phase angles of 83deg to an incredible 46udeg.
The HP4284 'LCR meter' (D down to .000001) or the HP4278 'C meter'(D
down to .00001) could make a stab at it but at enormous cost. The fine
phase(time) resolution needed, implies a lot of precision digital
signal processing and consequent expense.
Perhaps the best option is to restrict the test range to say a 'Q' of
1000 max and go for an older second hand HP LCR meter, say £1500 or a
HP4342 'Q' meter for a few hundred pounds.(Even then Q meter has a
lower limit of 22kHz +inductor Q problems.)
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup