The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Kevin Carney"
Subject: Re: Avoiding PLCs
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:43:06 -0400
Organization: IBM Global Services North -- Burlington, Vermont, USA
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Oct 2002 13:38:41 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Thank you for the backup Pat
Unfiltered email = email@example.com
"We ought always to know precisely why a given job
is done in a particular way, and why it is done at
all, and why it can't be done more efficiently,
if it must be done at all."-- T.J.Watson
"Bill Shymanski" wrote in message
> Backward compatiblity? Oh really ? Where can I buy:
> - 5 1/4 inch disk drives
> - MFM hard drives
> - 5 1/4 inch floppy disks!
> - XT-compatible keyboards
> - Anything that can plug into an AT backplane
> - An EGA monitor
> etc. etc. The PC is a moving target and can't be maintained for more than
> a couple of years. New laptops don't even come with RS 232 ports!
> One of the reasons a PLC is a Z80 in a $5000 box is that you'll be able to
> buy replacement parts for it for
> 20 years. Most control applications are not processor-limited. ( Yes, I'm
> aware that more powerful processors are available in PLCs but there's
> still thousands of Z80s out there doing the world's work.)
> A cheap desktop machine isn't even fit to be used on a desktop. By the
> time you "harden up" a PC to be useful for control applications, the darn
> thing costs as much as a
> real PLC and crashes roughly 3 orders of magnitude more often.
> The only time I crashed an Allen-Bradley PLC 2 processor was when I
> delibrately did something that a recall notice told me would stall the
> processor. Desktop PCs stall...a lot more frequently.
> Now, a PC, doing all the data logging and sending data to your networked
> office automation system, standing between the "office" world and the PLC
> world, is a really good thing - and you don't mind replacing it every
> couple of years. Of course, if they stop selling PCs with serial ports,
> it's going to be really hard getting it to talk to that 1770-KF2
> "Pat Ford" wrote in message
> > One reason is that PC's will be available for a long time, and
> > have amazing backwards compatibility. I can still run some programs from
> > at on my 2GHz machine. Another reason is that they are available no 30
> > delivery. The processing power in a modern PC combined with the low
> price is
> > also a good reason.
> > As far as a 3 month PC being obsolete may be true but the software
> tends to
> > still work and why upgrade if it works.
> > Pat
> > "Kevin Carney" wrote in message
> > news:firstname.lastname@example.org...
> > > I am just lurking but here is my $ 2 (adjusted for inflation) . With
> > > the rapid changes in the P.C. market (operating systems, hardware
> > > etc.), Why would a company want to put a PC as the controller for a
> > machine
> > > they may use for 15 years ? What if the PC poops after 3 years, you
> > be
> > > able to get the same interface cards to work with a new operating
> system ?
> > > My thoughts are that the latest and greatest every 6 months,
> obsoleting a
> > 3
> > > year old PC has killed the PC market. People aren't going to spend $
> > > every 2-3 years for the latest & greatest.
> > >
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup