The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
References: <0001HW.B9D43FDF0325BBB11662EAD0@news.covad.net> <0001HW.B9D4EE870344BA681662EAD0@news.covad.net> <3DB01FBB.EAF744F9@usa.net> <0001HW.B9D572FB034E39101662EAD0@news.covad.net> <3DB02E27.email@example.com> <3DB42BB1.EC27E431@bellatlantic.net> <3DB4C57E.B06B96D5@bellatlantic.net> <3DB61379.5EFB8B5C@bellatlantic.net> <3DB6D61C.483F9D22@bellatlantic.net>
Subject: Re: Difference between AC adapter and charger?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:28:33 +1000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:19:52 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
wrote in message
> Phil Allison wrote:
> > If the supply has
> > a current limit circuit and is connected to a pack of Ni-Cds then it is
> > ipso facto a constant current charger since the pack will draw current
> > that limit. The voltage on the pack will vary with the state of charge -
> > in God's name can that be called "constant voltage".
** No right. A power supply is not a "charger" and "connecting" means
The pack will not "draw current at that limit".
** Yes it will.
> in the example I posted, the current limit established by connecting
> the 7.2 V battery pack to the supply through a 150 ohm resistor,
> using a supply regulated at 13.8 volts, is 92 ma. But when the
> pack is fully charged, it will draw 36 ma. - well below the 92
> ma limit. Both the current through the cells and the voltage
> across them will vary as they charge.
** Then it is NOT constant voltage charging - is it ??
> > So you are arguing with something
> > > I not only never said, but specifically and strongly denounced.
> > ** Rubbish - you posts were full of ambiguity and still are.
> I'm beginning to see the light. You wish to argue for the sake
> of argument. I don't. I apologize if my posts are not clear
> to you.
** Your post are full of lies and obfuscations.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You may have missed the part of the post that mentions current
> > > > > limiting. The fact that a supply is voltage regulated does not
> > > > > preclude a current limiting resistance between the supply and
> > > > > the load. Ohms law. :-)
> > > >
> > > > ** What? 0.27 ohms worth - gimme a break.
> > >
> > > What are you talking about? Where did you come up with .27
> > > ohms resistance?
> > ** Read the whole thread mate - w toms gave that figure.
> What w_tom posted is his affair - I did not use that figure, and
> your response was to me, not him. If you disagree with what I
> said, then use what I said as the basis for your disagreement -
> not what someone else said.
** Read the whole threa - so you will know what is being claimed.
> If you take exception to what w_tom posted, take it up with him.
> Don't assume that because a figure was mentioned once in a thread
> that another poster uses that figure.
** Get real.
> > Try 150 ohms between a 7.2 volt pack consisting
> > > of 6 1600 mah cells and a 13.8 volt regulated supply. Worst
> > > case - 92 ma. With the cells fully charged, 36 ma. It makes
> > > a real nice trickle charger.
> > ** That is what is known in the trade as constant current
> So you understand that a constant voltage supply through a current
> limiting resistor (assuming values are properly chosen) does not pose
> no problem. We agree!
** No - you have repeatedly used the terms "constant voltage" or
"voltage regulated" charging incorrectly, and so have others, massivly
confusing a simple topic for any readers.
> Now, the next step is to graduate to constant voltage chargers.
> Build a voltage regulator that provides a constant 8 volts
> output. Connect it to your 7.2 volt battery pack. Put the
> current limiting on the input side of the supply, such that
> the supply is protected. You'll charge the cells to
> somewhat less than full capacity - but wou won't harm them,
> until a cell within the pack develops a short.
** With an 8 volt limit the 7.2 volt pack will not charge
Then you may
> over charge the remaining cells, which is what I indicated
> in my first post.
** Such a charger is useless, as I explaind and you snipped the lot.
> FYI, "constant voltage" (as I believe tom_w had in mind) chargers
> for NiCds exist in plenty.
** There you go again (to steal a phrase) - there is no such thing.
You mentioned wall wart style chargers -
> most of them are of that type.
** No, I mentioned "wall warts" - ie DC power supplies.
They don't include much more than a
> transformer & diode. They work fine.
** The not "much more" is the crucial bit. Maybe a resistor ??
I would prefer a different
> meaning to "constant voltage" than what I believe tom_w had in mind,
> and I would also prefer a different meaning for "constant current"
> that what you call it
> "That is what is known in the trade as constant current charging."
> referring to a constant voltage through a current limiting
** Misquotes. Charging with the use of a series current limiting
resistor is known as "constant current". It is not literally true ( ie
invariant) since as the pack voltage rises the current falls. Constant
voltgae uses a hard voltage source and the current tapers as the battery
acquires charge - used with lead acid and SLA only.
> > BTW Why did you snip my detailed explanation ??
> I did not respond to it - so there was no need to include
> it and waste bandwidth.
> We have, as I see it, no technical disagreement. You
> have explained what you meant by "dangerous" and using
> your description of that term I no longer have a hard
> time seeing how a simple voltage regulated charger is
** So you see the risk of explosions, fire etc - bloody marvellous.
. . . .. . ............ Phil
> > . . . . . . . . . . ..................... Phil
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup