The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Gibbo)
Date: 25 Oct 2002 19:19:01 GMT
Organization: AOL, http://www.aol.co.uk
Subject: Re: 95/54/EC - Automotive Directive
John Woodgate email@example.com wrote:
>I read in sci.electronics.design that Gibbo
>wrote (in <firstname.lastname@example.org>) about '95/54/EC
>- Automotive Directive', on Fri, 25 Oct 2002:
>>But I would like to know suitable standards for a 750 watt 12 volt battery
>>charger. As I read things we need PFC (which we have done) but others seem
>>be selling them without it (this is nothing to do with the automitive
>>- AC powered chargers are excempt from that)
>They are selling them without PFC because you may not need it!
Can you clarify that please ?
>You need to study BS EN 61000-3-2 with all its amendments, particularly
>the Millennium Amendment.
>OK, the safety standard for the Low Voltage Directive is BS EN
>For EMC, there are four standards:
>BS EN 55014-1: 1997 or 2001, for high-frequency emissions. The 1997
>edition can still be used, but for new products the later version should
>BS EN 55014-2:1997 for immunity.
>BS EN 61000-3-2:1995 with all amendments or 2001 for mains harmonic
>BS EN 61000-3-3: 1995 with amendment 1 for voltage changes impressed on
>the mains supply.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup