The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DB88D9C.50F75FA0@webaccess.net> <0f5u9.161$OM6.email@example.com> <3DB93622.BB09A3DB@webaccess.net> <3DB94D04.9D42B3C@webaccess.net> <3DB96654.F7847216@webaccess.net> <3DB9DA7E.5B5B09B9@webaccess.net>
Subject: Re: How does a mixer work?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust19.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1035623788 11003 126.96.36.199 (26 Oct 2002 09:16:28 GMT)
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:16:27 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:16:29 BST
"Chuck Simmons" wrote in
> Kevin Aylward wrote:
> > "Chuck Simmons" wrote in message
> > news:3DB96654.F7847216@webaccess.net...
> > > Kevin Aylward wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Chuck Simmons" wrote in message
> > > > news:3DB94D04.9D42B3C@webaccess.net...
> > > > > Kevin Aylward wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, the Fourier transform is well defined, i.e. F(f(t)).
> > > > > > The standard deviation is well defined Sd(x)
> > > > >
> > > > > By standard deviation, do you mean L2 metric distance rather
> > the
> > > > > usual meaning from probability? If so, is there any particular
> > reason
> > > > > why you could not say that you mean L2 metric distance?
> > > >
> > > > Its standard practise in signal information theory to call it
> > > > standard deviation.
> > > >
> > > > No idea what L2 means. I know what a metric is though:
> > > >
> > > > ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 dz^2 -c^2.dt^2
> > >
> > > That is not a metric! It is the pseudometric in relativity. A
> > > cannot take on negative values by definition! Look that one up.
> > Now why did I just *know* that you would nit pick at this. Yeah
> > technically a metric in Riemann geometry is positive definite, such
> > a metric in GR, actually isn't. However, it is *always* referred to
> > the metric despite this. Indeed, it is so much the norm that in
> > the word has been redefined by its common usage, much like "hey,
> > bad dude", which actually means "that's good".
> I can't see any evidence in mathematics that common usage has changed
> the definition.
The "effective" definition. You must be blind. Seriously.
>Books published quite recently define metric as it has
> been defined for more than a century and refer to creatures that are
> positive definite as pseudometrics. This is true because various
> features of the underlying topology change drastically if the metric
> form is not positive definite. The notion of open sets gets difficult.
Ahmmm. You *obviously* don't read *any* General Relativity books. This
is not debatable.
Try Google.com search on +"general relativity" +metric.
Out of 25,000 hits, I doubt very much if any will point out the
distinction between a true metric and a pseudo-metric.
Look, mate, they don't call it the pseudo-metric tensor, its just the
"metric tensor". Duh....
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup