Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
References: <3DB1F8E0.1464@Spam.Bots> <4Vrs9.92$0J6.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DB27E3A.F0C@Spam.Bots> <0Wts9.218$0J6.email@example.com> <3DB3411D.1B53@Spam.Bots> <7WMs9.18$JW5.firstname.lastname@example.org> <7ZDLAbAr77s9Ew6C@jmwa.demon.co.uk> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <4Zsu9.378$lU1.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <84yaYfAl96u9Ew5v@jmwa.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Aylward, Engelhardt: Noise in a transient sim?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust19.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1035750705 29458 188.8.131.52 (27 Oct 2002 20:31:45 GMT)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:31:42 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:31:45 GMT
"John Woodgate" wrote in message
> I read in sci.electronics.design that Kevin Aylward
> wrote (in
ntli.net>) about 'Aylward, Engelhardt: Noise in a transient sim?', on
> Sun, 27 Oct 2002:
> > There is *nothing* wrong in my
> >explanation, imo, at all.
> Ah, 'imo'. No, it's not *wrong*, but it isn't getting across.
> > Mike simple won't listen! Its not always the
> >fault of the teacher while a student wont understand.
> No, not always, but it takes two to tango, or, in this case, step on
> each other's toes.
> Your post contained a perfect example of 'talking past'. What is the
> standard deviation of a sinusoid? Zero *in the frequency domain*
> (neglecting the 'Big Bang to Heat Death' formality). Equal to the
> value *in the time domain*. Both right, apparently mutually
> contradictory, but not.
But I have already stated quite clearly that the BW, i.e. its standard
deviation, or rms, frequency width is zero for a pure sinewave, which is
why its representation in the time domain is infinite, i.e. it must
exist for ever. This is not talking pass someone. Its simple being
ignored, as you apparently have as well!
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.