The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Robert Baer
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
Subject: Re: TRIAC "wears out" on dimmer circuit
References: <3DB89391.E73EF17E@earthlink.net> <3DBA2E08.19B9E242@earthlink.net> <email@example.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 03:55:02 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:55:02 PST
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
Phil Allison wrote:
> "Robert Baer" wrote in message
> > Phil Allison wrote:
> > >
> > > "Robert Baer" wrote in message
> > > news:3DB89391.E73EF17E@earthlink.net...
> > >
> > > (snip)
> > >
> > > > Also please note the surge or turn-on current is much larger than
> > > > think.
> > >
> > > ** Are you a mind reader ?? The OP did not give any size for the
> > > surge.
> > >
> > > It would be about 16 amps peak for the first cycle or so -
> > > within the 12 amp triac's surge limits.
> > >
> > > . . . . . ............... Phil
> > But *NOT* within the unpublished I*I*T rating (spoken as "eye squared
> > tee")!
> ** So you are a double mind reader. First you read the OP's mind
> now you inform us that an unpublished I*I*t spec is unbelievably poor.
> The ITSM figure for the TIC 236 D is given as 100 amps and this
> is typical for a 12 amp triac which have I*I*t figures of about 40. Have
> you any reason, that does not involve ESP, to say that a 240 watt lamp load
> will do it in.
> ..................... Phil
By your own statement, the lamp takes 16 amp peak and the rating is 12
So by that alone, the rating is exceeded.
I have worked with Ignitrons, SCRs, Triacs and other solid state
devices in the daze (long ago) when I*I*T ratings were published or
otherwise reasonably available.
No current published data sheets by manufacturers give I*I*T ratings;
that info seems to have gone by way of the metaphorical dinosaur,
roughly 30 years ago.
The so-called info via ISTM looks as flaky as using a 2N2222 chip
mounted in a TO-3 package for 1 amp switching (do not laugh; this has
been done; prolly by execs that moved on to Enron).
And i can categorically state that one can be within current, power
and voltage ratings (even within SOAR ratings) and *still* be way
outside I*I*T ratings of these devices.
I do not have to be a mind reader to know that the resistance of any
incandescent lamp (or tube filament for that matter) is far lower than
the steady state resistance.
All one needs a little simple knowledge and the rest is a logical
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup