The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Subject: Re: eer
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Organization: The Armory
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test69 (20 September 1998)
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Richard Steven Walz)
Date: 29 Oct 2002 07:37:40 GMT
In article <email@example.com>,
>firstname.lastname@example.org (Richard Steven Walz)
>>>email@example.com (Richard Steven Walz)
>>>So, if you really want to get rid of it(which also seems questionable),
>>>why can't you mix the remainder back up with the original talus and put
>>>it back where you found it. Overall less radioactive than when you
>>U is EASY to get rid of. Pu is NOT.
>So what makes Pu hard to get rid of?
It is HORRIBLY carcinogenic, and likes to bind to organics, uranium not.
>>Also, wherever we get water is tested,
>>and we are experienced at avoiding deriving city water from radioactive
>>springs, and there are a bunch in the southwest. If we start putting
>>radioactive stuff back, then we wind up putting both Pu and a host of other
>>long-lived isotopes with it, and we risk suddenly finding that we didn't
>>REALLY understand the aquifer very well and that we have polluted the shit
>>out of massive acquifers upon which human life depends!!!
>This is what prompted my question. You took half the radioactivity out of
>an area that was already radioactive. What is it that would actually make
>matters worse by putting the remainder back?
You OBVIOUSLY don't know what a breeder reactor does, it takes useless U238
and makes Pu. LOTS of Pu!!
>Even if an aquifer proves to be a problem it seems, at least to me, that
>it would be an even bigger problem if you had not done anything at all.
If you have been living on top of a strata for 1 million years, and know
where and what is safe to eat and drink, in fact you EVOLVED there, do
you think that stirring it all up to settle in some other manner really
deep down would be a good idea?? If all the poisons your body just cannot
handle, like heavy metals, were stirred up and poured on your lettuce,
would you eat it? Use your brain. Mother nature's a bitch.
>Why won't you get the same brew of isotopes with the stuff sitting right
>where it was? The decay paths do not seem to change much if any
>with the stuff in a reactor, they just get speed up a lot.
You need to study this seriously to learn why NOT!
-Steve Walz firstname.lastname@example.org ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup