The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Winfield Hill
Subject: Re: Help - Power mosfets - difficult load
Date: 29 Oct 2002 06:37:52 -0800
Organization: Rowland Institute
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3DB81206.E28CA99F@rica.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DB963BE.939694C2@rica.net> <email@example.com> <3DBC2B63.146AA440@rica.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DBD434D.3BA1BB54@rica.net> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 2.98
Bill Allison wrote
> Tony, John
> I know that discontinuous low frequency operation will be inefficient,
> 1) Nobody has disagreed with my contention that those large low
> frequency impulses will be *very* useful in overcoming stiction and
> allowing the motor to be controlled smoothly at start-up and at very
> low speed. ...
You could force a 50% 50Hz duty cycle on top of the high-frequency
PWM, but only for the lowest PWM ratios, to create vibration.
> 2) *Provided* I can keep within fet ratings, I don't care too much
> about efficiency - the unit is going to be powered up for only 10
> seconds at most every 5 minutes at least so heating isn't a huge
> problem and irrespective of frequency, at full throttle (i.e 100%
> duty cycle) losses will be due only to RDSon.
I showed in detail how you'll be heating the FETs with 4x higher
dissipation by using a 50Hz PWM rate, and running them near or past
their specs in the 25% to 100% PWM region. A FET junction's thermal
time constant is well under a second, more like 0.1 second, so your
10-second operating time may not be of much help, if you intend to
keep the FET junction below the recommended temperature limits.
> If tests show this isn't do-able (fets-wise) at 50 Hz then circuitry
> will need to be devised to produce a 500Hz PWM drive from the 50Hz
> control signal but I want to avoid that complication if possible.
A easy way to do this would be to use a pot-operated PWM-generator
circuit, and run the pot from your RC servo output shaft. :-)
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup