From: John Woodgate
Subject: Re: eer
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 06:01:43 +0000
Organization: JMWA Electronics Consultancy
Reply-To: John Woodgate
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:55:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01 <5Z8C9wtxbnpWyFnyfFzqmVF739>
I read in sci.electronics.design that StevJensen
wrote (in <email@example.com>) about 'eer', on
Thu, 31 Oct 2002:
>>John Woodgate firstname.lastname@example.org
>>I read in sci.electronics.design that StevJensen
>>wrote (in <email@example.com>) about 'eer', on
>>Wed, 30 Oct 2002:
>>>Just what difference does it make which particular isotope is emitting
>>>the electrons, hydrogen, or light?
>>The isotope doesn't in itself matter. It's the *energy* that matters -
>>how fast the alphas and betas are moving and what wavelength the photons
>>have. More energy means more physical and physiological effects.
>I am just trying to find out if the by products of the reaction are any worse,
>in this regard, than the stuff that was there to begin with. It isn't readily
>apparent that this would be the case.
It may not be readily apparent, but it IS the case.
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!