The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: John Woodgate
Subject: Re: eer
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 07:39:29 +0000
Organization: JMWA Electronics Consultancy
Reply-To: John Woodgate
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 07:43:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01 <5Z8C9wtxbnpWyFnyfFzqmVF739>
I read in sci.electronics.design that StevJensen
wrote (in <email@example.com>) about 'eer', on
Fri, 1 Nov 2002:
>Actually Ionizing radiation is the easiest to deal with. A sheet
>of tinfoil will cover the problem + it generally will not penetrate
>the skin(which is dead anyway) unless you happen to be in
>physical contact with the source.
>Neutrons are not ionizing radiation.
>Neither is gamma.
>Both are potentially more dangerous than the ionizing kind
>because they will penetrate. OTOH on the up side the
>probability that they will interact with something internal
>to you is fairly low.
This ALL WRONG.
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup