From: Fred Bloggs
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Subject: Re: V regulator input cap size?
References: <0001HW.B9DAE8B7003F6E14163F7590@news.covad.net> <3DC1A954.email@example.com> <1%hw9.136243$Q3S.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DC1AF48.email@example.com> <3DC1C89E.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3DC1DBEA.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 20:59:23 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 12:59:23 PST
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
John Fields wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 11:17:55 GMT, "Spehro Pefhany"
>>(BTW, I'm NOT going to do a detailed design, the information
>>is too sketchy, my aim was to show a concept not to complete a design, and
>>I don't have time right now to make arbitrary assumptions and labor to
>>satisfy the resulting constraints. The process is obvious to anyone
>>"skilled in the art" as the patent guys say, and we've shipped a lot of
>>product with similar designs, so *I* know it works very well indeed).
> Hi, Spehro,
> It does, in fact, work wery well.
> I've used the same and similar designs myself many times and never
> had problems with them. (Yet!^)
> I just started on the front end of the detailed design to have some
> fun with Bloggs, who responded as I expected he would...
Okay- well be sure to keep us apprised of your progress-))