Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
References: <3DC282F0.email@example.com> <3DC2E327.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DC3B8B8.email@example.com> <3DC3EFA5.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: zero-power toggle circuit; was, how to master electronics
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust19.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1036316587 417 22.214.171.124 (3 Nov 2002 09:43:07 GMT)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 09:43:05 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 09:43:08 GMT
"Winfield Hill" wrote in message
> Kevin Aylward wrote...
> > Wafer wrote ...
> >> For instance, if I ask you to come up with a simple circuit that
> >> would toggle power to a load on and off with each press of a
> >> momentary switch, but draw no current in the off state, what
> >> would you do? I would bet that your circuit would be nothing
> >> like mine.
> > It would be simple, using standard techniques that are known to
> > work. There is no point reinventing the wheel. In this case a
> > cmos JK or T flipflop driving a mos comes to mind.
> I think Wafer has in mind a discrete transistor solution.
Well, maybe he did, but again, in my view a good circuit is not one that
has some unusual feature or some sort of "clever" approach. The *best*
approach are circuits that are bog standard, easily understood by simple
inspection and meet spec. "Best" being defined as the ability to ship
reliable product with few returns, in a timely time to market manner.
This is what we get paid to do, not to produce aesthetically pleasing
circuits that we like to impress people with.
I am a bit hard on this issue as I feel that so many have simply the
wrong view on what being an EE is all about. We get paid to make
*profit* for the companies that employ us, not to produce elegant
circuits. The contractual duty therefore is to maximise profit.
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.