The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "N. Coesel"
Subject: Re: TCPA (Trusted Computing Platform Alliance) and future PC use for engineering
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:24:59 +0100
Organization: Planet Internet
References: <3DC58036.335D721E@erckert-ibe.de> <3DC59C6F.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Nov 2002 16:26:30 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
"N. Thornton" wrote in message
> firstname.lastname@example.org (The little lost angel) wrote in
> > On 4 Nov 2002 07:35:05 -0800, email@example.com (N. Thornton) wrote:
> > >I understand one of the ramifications of pratadium is that if you have
> > >a hardware problem, you will be unable to recover any data whatever
> > >off your HDD. Put the HDD in any other machine and it simply wont be
> > >possible to recover anything off it. Who would choose that?
> > Well, data recovery businesses would :)
> Will they be able to though?
> > They just need a machine that ignores the DRM/TCPA/Paladium thing and
> > a software tool that mods the DRM signature for everything that's
> > recovered... I expect that particular tool to be widely available from
> > some Russian site within weeks (if not days) of Paladium becoming
> > anything near mass acceptance.
> But businesses wouldn't touch that, normally. And businesses are the
> main puter buyers.
> And home users tend to buy the old business machines, complete with
> OS. Hence the problem. However much people look down on prat machines,
> low cost will mean a lot will still get bought by home users.
> > >The problem is, since it looks like Intel will play ball, many could
> > >end up buying pratadium without understanding what they're buying,
> > >thus it could become common. Then various major business software
> > >packages will require pratadium to work, then all new MS OSes wil be
> > >pratadium only... I can easily see a day when pratadium could take
> > >over.
> > That is true, but AMD appears to be adopting the approach of
> > TCPA as an option switchable by the user. So we would have a hardware
> > platform that doesn't forces the user to use TCPA, then it is only a
> > simple step to having software that ignores or flout TCPA or bypasses
> > the OS's TCPA. Or simply we see more people hopping onto the Linux
> > bandwagon.
> > Who knows, Paladium might backfire on MS so badly by doing the
> > one thing they least wanted... drive folks towards Linux.
> Yup, its bound to, but in a sense it doesn't matter. If they get one
> more round of upgrades out of it, and lose even as much as 10% of the
> customer base, they're still ahead financially. I hope it would lose
> them more, but presumably they don't think it will, and I think
> they're probably right. People have bought and signed the most
> outrageous crap so far, for the simple reason we don't have good
> > Already it's
> > been observed that many corporates customers have slammed the brakes
> > on using XP and taking Linux into serious consideration due to the
> > licensing scheme MS has come up with.
> > >If this happens I think it would do an immense amount of damage to the
> > >whole computer thing. Imagine the problems that result when people
> > >start looking for alternatives to a closed pratadium PC market. The
> > >compatibility issues that dogged the puter industry in the 80s will be
> > >back, and will create all hell.
> > Actually it wouldn't be too bad a thing. Sure we have a lot of
> > standardized stuff... but it also means competition is being reduced
> > as the smaller players get shoved out the door by established dominant
> > standards player. With a splintering, new players can come in and we
> > may see actual improvements vs
> > now-you-see-clippy-now-you-don't-see-clippy type of "improved
> > software"
> Well, look at Linux. It keeps getting better, but it really lags
> behind Windows in significant ways. That's the result of relatively
> small scale efforts. The same would happen with splintered PC OSes,
Sad but true.
> > Plus, it can be difficult to convince some folks that W2010 is not
> > better than W2005 (it's got a bigger number, surely it's better!).
> Exactly. I think most people bought Me and XP in ignorance, so I would
> expect to see the same pattern with pratadium. Ignorance rules.
Partly true, a lot of people bought/buy Me and XP because it's new and _may_
solve some problems they had with their computers.
> But sadly it doesn't matter, in the sense that they have made off with
> the most outrageous amounts of money already. I'm no communist, but I
> think there comes a time when its just taking the piss. After all, how
> many lives could just half of MS's money save? Many think that for one
> person to be worth over a billion is a bit obscene, especially someone
> as sociopathic as Bill.
:-)) The amount of money is there in share value. Bill can never cash in on
his shares because that would make the value of his shares (and many others)
go down the drain.
> I think if MS had decided to make all their old OSes free for anyone
> to use, they'd sell 33% less, but they'd maintain a reasonable level
> of public goodwill, and be able to carry on and on. I honestly don't
> think many people are going to forgive MS once someone else comes
> along. That company will be totally rejected, and have no further
> profit potential.
The reason why Microsoft is still in business is because all their products
work together (wether you like it or not). This has proven to be a major
advantage over their competitors. Look at how Wordperfect and Lotus got
whiped away from the PC. WP and Lotus went from industry leaders to
absolutely nothing in just a few years.
Reply to: nico nctdev nl @ .
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup