The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Chuck Simmons
Organization: You jest.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.33 i586)
Subject: Re: O.T. Math help
References: <3DCB3310.C806A8AE@rica.net> <%0wz9.21822$Ku.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DCED471.156A1A53@webaccess.net> <3DCEFCE2.96DCC7FA@webaccess.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 14:54:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 06:54:12 PST
Tom MacIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:41:38 GMT, Chuck Simmons
> >This led to an
> >argument with a younger generation teacher about why the static pressure
> >inside a small bubble is greater than the static pressure in a large
> >one. That was frustrating because there is a quite simple integral that
> >gives the result.
> The ratio of the area to the volume is greater for a smaller body
> (this is why small animals have to eat significant amounts of food for
> their bodyweight, as they radiate a lot of heat for their size?);
> could that be related?
It is related. The bubble calculation is really addition of forces. The
heat calculation is more of a "flux" sort of thing but the integrals
will be very similar.
... The times have been,
That, when the brains were out,
the man would die. ... Macbeth
Chuck Simmons email@example.com
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup