From: Spehro Pefhany
Subject: Re: maximum reverse voltage allowed on electrolytic caps?
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:34:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:34:27 EST
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:40:05 -0000, the renowned "Ian Buckner"
>"Continuous application of reverse voltage without normal
>polarization will result in a degradation of leakage current.
>In conditions under which continuous application of a reverse
>voltage could occur two similar capacitors should be used in
>a back-to-back configuration with the negative terminations
Right, the application of a VERY small reverse voltage
continuously is not covered in these specs. Based on this,
I think 50mV continuous would probably be okay, and the <10mV
(basically Vos of the opamp) the OP had in mind would
definitely be okay.
After all, when you connect two caps in back-to-back, one
will get reverse biased a bit, up until the point where
the leakage increases, probably a volt or more.
>Once upon a time Philips used to do some aluminium parts
>that were actually specified for (low) reverse voltage operating.
>"Solid aluminium electrolytic" as I recall, since discontinued.
>They were intended to compete with the bead tantalums, but
>were more expensive.
This is the first time I've actually seen a cap spec'd for
reverse voltage operation. Doesn't mean they won't work,
just that the manufacturer doesn't characterize them for
that mode of operation. Like BJTs in reverse.
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
firstname.lastname@example.org Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.co