NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:42:21 -0600
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (John Fields)
Subject: Re: Best bomb detonator? (Hi FBI)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:19:37 GMT
Organization: Austin Instruments, Inc.
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
On 17 Nov 2002 17:35:09 -0800, Winfield Hill
> John, back off, simmer down and smell the coffee. These days
> Google does very effective searching on old conversations, and
> sadly some of it is a gold mine for those with evil intentions.
> Let's vow here and now not to add to the stash.
You vow what you want to, but don't drag me into something which is
Ill-conceived and would put what I'm free to post at the mercy of
some "committee" which knows better than I do what should be posted
and what shouldn't. Try to post to some of the moderated groups
sometime with ideas or attitudes which the moderators don't like to
see what it's like. As for me, I'll be the arbiter of what I should
post and what I shouldn't, thank you very much.
> Most of what
> we say has little or no relevance to any terrorism, but rest
> assured we are totally capable of rattling off the recipe for
> multiple items of serious bad news. Sure, simple items could
> be put to nefarious purpose, but that needn't be out concern.
> I just posted an "hour of power" timer, but this kind of stuff
> isn't and cannot be counted as weaponry.
Really? If someone was looking for something like that to use in
weaponry, guess what they'd say? "Thank you, infidel, Allah will
soon reward you for your stupidity."
The point is that _you_ made the decision that your circuit was
innocuous, that's as it should be, and I expect to play by the same
rules regarless of what you or anyone else thinks.