The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Tom Del Rosso"
References: <email@example.com> <3DCF2A72.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: 555 Monostable?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:12:45 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:12:45 GMT
"Winfield Hill" wrote in
> Fred Bloggs wrote...
> > John Fields wrote:
> >> My suggestion is to blow off the 555/556 approach and to use
> >> something like an HC123 or a 4538, both of which are designed
> >> to allow retriggering without an outboard kluge.
> > Don't require an IQ above 10 to apply is what you really mean...
> There are sophisticated ways to employ either of the above ICs.
Doesn't it require extra components?
I think the 555 should have been two different ICs - one for astable and
one for monostable. They would have been more versatile in their roles
than one solution for both.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup