Subject: Re: RF power measurement (again)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 06:30:08 -0800
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
Paul Burridge wrote:
> On 18 Nov 2002 16:44:29 -0800, email@example.com (Tom Bruhns) opined
> >o Do you know that the scope is good for the frequency you're
> The signal under test is 40Mhz., the scope is rated at 20., so I
> accept the test set up isn't perfect. However, I was under the
> impression that the general level of signal envelope would still be
> pretty accurately displayed at double the frequency?
My car goes 80 MPH, but I'm pretty sure I can win a race against 160 MPH
You've got it backwards, if you want to measure 40 MHz, get yourself an
> >o Does the resistor get warm?
> Not very. Most of the heat as such appears to come from the tuning
> >Can you compare with
> > a similar resistor excited with DC?
> Can you "excite" anything with DC? :-)
> >o Do you know that the transmitter is designed to output
> > power to a 50 ohm load?
> No it's just my best guess.
> >o Are you sure the resistor looks reasonably like 50
> > ohms at your operating frequency?
> I assume so. It's not wire-wound.
> "I was going to help him up, but then I thumped him."
> Michael Head's plea in mitigation to Weybridge Magistrates, Sept. 1975
Bunch of stuff For Sale and Wanted at the link below.
Tek 2465, TFT projector, ham radio, 30pS pulser
Tektronix Concept Books...