The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DKC9.467$Lq.email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Class B amplifiers: what are the large low-value resistors for?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust19.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1037800271 26962 22.214.171.124 (20 Nov 2002 13:51:11 GMT)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:51:08 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:51:11 GMT
Phil Allison wrote:
> "Kevin Aylward" wrote in message
>> *Pure* class B dose not require temperature compensation. Temperature
>> compensation is to compensate the *bias* current. If there is no bias
>> current, there is nothing to compensate. The reason for this
>> misunderstanding could be that is usually to say class B as
>> shorthand, when in fact one rarely uses class B, it is always class
>> AB, i.e. there is at least some standing current.
> ** Many commercial power amps produced since the late 1960s
> operate with the main output devices completely cut off at idle - or
> pure class B. The Crown DC300 and DC300A were early examples along
> with most later Crowns and Phase Linears and many clones.
I meant *real amplifiers*:-)
Crown DC300's were crap, despite their reputation. In fact, Crown have a
current offering of a switching amp which has an amazingly high 0.5%
distorting at 1kz. I dread to think what the IMD is as they don't even
> There was temp compensation built in to make sure that the
> output transistors did not become biased on at high temperatures due
> to their Vbe dropping.
I agree that technically this is temperature compensation, but the
phrase temperature compensation when applied to amplifier output stages,
usually refers to protecting against thermal runaway. I don't see why
they would bother to prevent the outputs being slightly on. Its very
unlikely that that could cause thermal runaway, and the more bias the
less x-over distortion. It sounds like a right silly idea, probably
because it was done 30 years ago when they didn't know any better. I
still remember using 100 watt transistor amp modules that used a driver
transformer because the designers were too daft to realise that the
product did not have any glass in it.
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup