The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3DKC9.467$Lq.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Class B amplifiers: what are the large low-value resistors for?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:36:24 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:25:57 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"Kevin Aylward" wrote in message
> Phil Allison wrote:
> >>> ** Many commercial power amps produced since the late 1960s
> >>> operate with the main output devices completely cut off at idle - or
> >>> pure class B. The Crown DC300 and DC300A were early examples along
> >>> with most later Crowns and Phase Linears and many clones.
> >> I meant *real amplifiers*:-)
> > ** You know what that is do you ? I doubt it.
> Oh...I think so.
** Bullshit - you have no idea.
> >> Crown DC300's were crap, despite their reputation.
> > ** That completley idiotic remark reveals a lot about you Kevin
> > and it is not good.
> In what way was it an idiotic remark?
** That you cannot see it says how deranged you are.
Are you claiming that the 1MHz fts
> of the 60's resulted in a state of the art high power amplififier on a
> par to a design of say the 80's and later?.
** Proves it even more - get help Kevin - you are in trouble.
> > I don't see why> they would bother to prevent the outputs being
> > It sounds like a right silly idea, probably
> >> because it was done 30 years ago when they didn't know any better.
> > ** No arrogance is beyond you is it ?
> > I
> >> still remember using 100 watt transistor amp modules that used a
> >> driver transformer because the designers were too daft to realise
> >> that the product did not have any glass in it.
> > ** Unlike yourself no doubt who has too many glasses in him.
> Look, we all make silly mistakes in our lives,
** And you are making them now - get help.
BTW How is your missus ?
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup