The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Mark Fergerson
Organization: @Home Network Member
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en]C-AtHome0407 (Win98; U)
Subject: Re: Small Tesla Coil
References: <3ddcc905$0$22279$9b0f33e3@clyde> <3DDD385B.2200CDF1@cox.net> <email@example.com> <7EED9.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <_iND9.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 19:43:47 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:43:47 EST
Steve Jones wrote:
> first of all rebar is worthy of no comment
It does everything a Lightsaber does
(if you swing it hard enough) and needs
no power. ;>)
> light can be bent with magnetic fields - it has been done - big
> electromagnet - granted
> a torch and magnet is hardly an effective example.
I think not. Do you have a cite for
> I am interested to know if the technology in the film star wars (to name
> just one) could become a reality the other technology that intruiges me is
> the antigravity system for hover bikes etc
> this is not so far off as apparently scientists are near to creating it for
Look, SW is basically a fairy tale
dressed in science-fiction clothing. The
functions of fairy tale "technology"
(magic mirrors, flying carpets, etc.)
have been realized (TV, airplanes), but
look and work nothing like their
> sure a light sword would be a useless weapon but then that is not the point
> the point is can these technologies be realised in our lifetime at all?
Sure, but why bother, when better
> As I said its easy to mock - much harder to think about it
Easy if you grok technology and the
limits physics impose.
Mark L. Fergerson
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup