From: John Woodgate
Subject: Re: Nixie Tube Clock -- cool gift idea
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:05:27 +0000
Organization: JMWA Electronics Consultancy
Reply-To: John Woodgate
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 05:34:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01 <5Z8C9wtxbnpWyFnyfFzqmVF739>
I read in sci.electronics.design that René wrote (in
<firstname.lastname@example.org>) about 'Nixie Tube Clock --
cool gift idea', on Thu, 28 Nov 2002:
>On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:34:23 +0100, "Frank Bemelman"
>>I thought $135 for my kit was already ridiciously expensive.
>>Looks almost the same. I'll put a link on my website to
>It is for Hi-End audiophiles. Cheap will not do.
>The time has to be represented in a open, well contoured fashion; the
>depth and definition, brightness and realism must be flawless. It
>should boast a mono crystalline oxide-free power cord and vibration
>And it should be 100% mechanical. Electric time has poor fidelity.
Not surprising at all. Electrical time is digital, mechanical time is
analogue. No audiophool will have anything to do with digital stuff.
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!