The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: John Popelish
Organization: This space not available for advertising.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U)
Subject: Re: photodetector circuit, high speed with good ambient light rejection
References: <3DE69C97.email@example.com> <3DE76E53.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:49:40 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:49:40 EST
Winfield Hill wrote:
> Hobbs points out that with moderate signal currents that create a high
> r_e, an external bias current can be added to the BJT's emitter and
> a like current taken from the collector. This approach relies on the
> absence of shot noise in resistor-generated currents. It would seem
> practical up to bias/signal ratios of up to say 25 or 50, but at some
> point weak signals get one into trouble attempting to balance the two
> bias currents and struggling with an unknown lost-current factor from
> the BJT's beta. Hobbs suggests using high-beta transistors like the
> MPSA18 (B>500), but watch out for their input higher capacitance (e.g.
> 8pF), further complicating issues at high frequencies. As is often
> the case, a panoply of compromises must be examined.
Win, I found Hobbs paper to be very interesting and thought
provoking. I am weak on noise calculation problems and intend to
study this at some length, to learn more. But the paper has given me
a couple of other ideas I would like you and others to criticize.
Again, referring to Philip Hobbs article:
Figure 9 shows a combination DC voltage bias source and follower added
to the diode to help reduce the effect of diode capacitance by
bootstrapping. Is there any benefit to this approach without the
cascode amplifier between the diode and the transimpedance amplifier?
Isn't the main purpose of the cascode to allow the opamp to tolerate
the diode capacitance better?
What if you replaced the follower transistor with a fast opamp
follower like this:
| | | >-+--
| ^ 0v-|+/
+-|-/ R1 |
| | C1
With, say, R1 and R2 1 meg each, And C2 very much smaller than C1
(and, possibly adjustable) to produce a net follower gain of slightly
more than 1 at the high frequency end of the response, to not only
reduce the diode capacitance effect, but to neutralize the diode
capacitance at the transimpedance amplifier input. Wouldn't this do
away with the need for the cascode transistor and current adding and
One might even add a series resistor to C1 to extend the bandwidth of
Even if this follower had the desired capacitance reducing effect,
what other problems would such a circuit create?
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup