The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
References: <3DE69C97.email@example.com> <3DE76E53.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DE90887.A854256A@rica.net> <3DE9798E.22051DE1@SpamMeSenseless.us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: photodetector circuit, high speed with good ambient light rejection
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust19.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1038729063 10128 184.108.40.206 (1 Dec 2002 07:51:03 GMT)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 07:50:57 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 07:51:04 GMT
Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Kevin Aylward wrote:
>> John Popelish wrote:
>>> Winfield Hill wrote:
>>>> Hobbs points out that with moderate signal currents that create a
>>>> high r_e, an external bias current can be added to the BJT's
>>>> emitter and a like current taken from the collector. This
>>>> approach relies on the absence of shot noise in
>>>> resistor-generated currents.
>> I think he is a bit of a smart arse for stating "because of the Pauli
>> exclusion principle...metal resistors..no noise.." etc. There is no
>> shot noise in resistors because there is no basic mechanism to
>> generate shot noise in resistors. Its not even worth mentioning, imo.
> The Pauli principle is the physics that prevents shot noise in metal
I am just not happy with this terminology. A principle does not prevent
anything from happening. For a resistor to generate shot noise it must
be something other then a resistor.
>Shot noise occurs in a great many conduction processes, in
> fact any time that there is nothing forcing the electrons to be highly
> correlated--metals are the exceptions, but are of course common in
> circuits. People often try replacing metal resistors with, for
> example, current mirror sources, and are surprised at the poor
Shot noise is an effect that occurs when electrons are overcoming a
potential barrier in a statistical manner. ie. across semiconductor
junctions or from a heated cathode. It is not usually attributed as an
effect in bulk material. You would have to explain a mechanism of why
shot noise would appear in a homogeneous resistance.
>> I'll have a think on what you are showing here. In the meantime, its
>> worth pointing out that this two transistor circuit is just an obtuse
>> way of achieving the more common npn/pnp compound pair that looks
>> like one npn transistor. Topologically, they are *identical*. That
>> is, the re of the top emitter pnp transistor is reduced by the hfe
>> of the lower npn, so that the npn can be ran at a lower current,
>> thereby reducing its base current shot noise.
> Um, no.
> That is, not unless you're going to call all circuits where
> one transistor drives another identical. Both transistors are NPN,
> for one thing. I don't think you've understood how the circuit works.
I understand exactly how the circuit works, apparently you dont. Do you
know what "topologically" means? Draw the small signal eqivelent circit
for the nmp/pnp compound pair and this dual npn circuit and it will be
>> The simplest improvement/simplification is simply to replace the 2
>> bipolar with a low noise jet. Your then left with basically
>> 1nv/sqrthz (e.g U309) voltage noise and essentially zero current
>> noise. This results in a much simpler circuit with equivalent or
>> better performance, and the analysis is also much simpler to boot!
> Jerry Graeme's book on transimpedance amps has a lot of circuits using
> discrete front ends on ordinary op amps. However, getting 1
> nV/sqrt(Hz) from a JFET requires a *big* JFET, for which read
> "high-capacitance". U309s are nowhere near 1 nV/sqrt(Hz)--the data
> sheet I'm looking at says 10 nV, typical, and that's at 10 mA drain
> current. At 1 MHz, that will contribute 6 pA/sqrt(Hz), which is 17
> dB above the shot noise of 2 microamps.
You have not looked at the actual graphs then. They get very low after
the 1/f region. There are a number of fets in the 5pf region with 1nv
type noise. The other option is a gasfet. I agree that you do need to
drive a bit of current through them though.
I prefer the jet source follower buffer, with its drain bootstrapped
(net Cin ~1p), driving a cascade of high pass amplifiers to produce an
overall flat response.
>> In addition, this technique only works for the large diodes
>> considered here, e.g. 100p, in the sense of achieving the *best* S/N
>> at a high BW. The idea is that one is converting the 100p diode
>> capacitance to the input capacitance of the op-amp via the low re of
>> the transistor. If the diode was a high speed one in the 1pf range,
>> and the circuit was optimised as such, the capacitance at the opamp
>> input node would kill you. You would be back to square one, i.e. a
>> current source with capacitance, driving a virtual earth. There is
>> no such thing as a free lunch.
> Quite so--small diodes and high photocurrents make life very much
> easier, and should be used where possible. However, in the context of
> optical measurements, we commonly have to use large photodiodes to
> get a reasonable photocurrent--there's an invariant called the
> etendue, which is the product of the image size and the solid angle
> of illumination. For a given level of coherence, you can't focus an
> image below a certain size, which can easily be tens of thousands of
> wavelengths' diameter. Laser measurements or optical communications
> have a different set of tradeoffs, and I don't know a great deal
> about building 10 Gb/s photoreceivers. I picked a difficult but
> reasonably common sort of problem encountered in building optical
> You might be surprised at the number of people who build beautiful
> optical instruments and then go and lose 20 dB of SNR in a crummy
> front end amplifier because they don't know any better.
Not really surprised at all:-)
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup